Maquiladora Industry in United States

In this paper I pull up stakes deal the history and practices of the Maquiladora industry. I volition discuss its background, its problems, the benefits it offers to f each(prenominal) in States companies, and the impact the NAFTA has and entrust have on the industry. In addition, I go out make a suggestion on a possible st set upgy the Maquiladoras can fall out in order to address the challenges brought on by the NAFTA, to ensure it system a strong baron in the future.Mexican agricultural workers had been give temporary work visas allowing them to work in the United States agricultural industries with a program called the Bracero Program until 1965 when this program was terminated. As a solving of this termination, the unemploy handst rate had exceeded 70% in indisputable couch cities. In may of 1965 the Border Industrialization Program was established as a deputy for the Bracero program. It was later renamed the Maquiladora Program.The program was established by the Mexican government to bid employment for Mexicos rapidly growing population along its environ with the United States. This program was utilized to keep Mexicans from entering the United States. The conception was that Mexican workers would be kept on the Mexican stead of the border if they were given factory jobs on the Mexican side. The Maquiladora program also cute to attract foreign manufacturing facilities, technology, and know-how by giving a permanent r stock-stillue enhancement holiday to manufacturing companies that would set up twin plants on the Mexican side of the border.In the beginning of the program, all foreign-owned operations had to be located in spite of appearance a 20-kilometer strip along the US-Mexican border. Since 1972 they can be located anyplace in Mexico. In 1996 there were around 2,500 Maquiladoras 35% of them were located in the interior states of Mexico. Last year there were over 3,000 and much and more of these operations are being located o utside of the border regions. all(prenominal) of Mexicos 31 states has at least one Maquiladora.Maquiladoras, also referred to as in bond or twin plants, are allowed to temporarily result into Mexico (free of tax) machinery, equipment, replacement parts, raw materials, and just about anything that was used in the accumulation or manufacture of semi-finished or finished products. Once assembled or manufactured, the Maquila products mustiness be exported unless special permission is obtained to sell a limited number of output in the Mexican market. When these products are imported back to the United States, import duties are levied on the foreign value-added only. If Maquila products stay in Mexico, the are subject to applicable Mexican duties.The largest issue surrounding the Maquiladora industry is the exploitation of cheap labor. The working conditions are often unsafe, workers are non stipendiary adequately for their labor, attempts to unionize are discouraged and sexual d iscrimination and harassment are too common.The conditions in and outside the Maquiladoras are terrible. Workers perform tasks such as welding without protective masks, leather gloves, or goggles (in legion(predicate) instances) and industrial accidents and toxic exposures are common. This, along with malnutrition caused by low salaries, assign skin illnesses, cancer, irregularities in menstruation, abortions, tumors, intoxication and birth of undernourished or change babies.Of the employees, many are young girls and women ranging from the ages of 14 to 20. They work 6 old age a week in 10-hour shifts. The bonny weekly salary for a Maquiladora worker is US$35 $45 even though the average monthly rent for a house with public services such as running water and electricity is around $200 a month.For the most part, Maquiladoras are unorganized. In those that are organized, state-controlled unions represent the workers. Although roughly companies are unionized on paper, the union s, for the most part, function to reinforce centering policies rather than for the benefit of workers. Then there are what are called tail unions. These unions do not fight for the workers rights. The workers do not even know them and have never seen their union leaders. When a involution arises in a factory, management informs the worker that their unions have accept these or those conditions. Not only are they not protected by animate unions, those that attempt to unionize and are often threatened or bribed by plant managers and the government.In many companies, discrimination against and harassment of the female employees is precise common. Female job applicants are required to produce urine samples to be used for pregnancy test, while some have company doctors and nurses try the applicants or ask confidential information concerning their contraceptive practices. This is done because heavy(predicate) women are refused employment. sexual harassment is often the rule rather than the exception. Rapes lead frequently and few are reported because women fear being fired or shamefullisted. Shame and humiliation also keep them quiet. In Mexico, men and women are equal before the law, but the law does not bed discrimination as a problem to be solved.The Pollution Brought on by the MaquiladorasThe increased pollution, accompanied by the dumping of tons of unsteady wastes, poses a serious health threat to the residents of Mexico as well as the resident of the bordering US states. There are several canals that are black with chemical wastes that have been measured at levels that greatly exceed allowable standards. unrivaled factory was caught dumping drums of paint, solvents, and shellac into a drain. In some other areas there are abandoned lead smelters and air full of vulgarism and dust from brick-making ovens and smoldering tire dumps.Main Advantages for the United States CompaniesFor the United States companies this was a great advantage since Maqu iladoras operates at very low costs in places where the notes is weaker than the dollar marksuch as Mexico. The less a currency is worth, the more relative value the dollar has. Since Mexicos peso is relatively week, companies can trade their dollars for pesos with which they pay workers and expenses. The products they manufacture, however, are sold for dollars, increasing their lettuce by huge margins whenever the local currency falls. They could enhance competitiveness, reduce their costs, and exert quality by placing their labor-intensive operations in the less certain Mexico, benefiting from the lower wage rates there.For many US companies, manufacturing in Mexico has get under ones skin necessary to battle overseas competition. Since many manufacturers are moving to just-in-time farm animal systems, the quick delivery possible from Mexicos border towns offers a square advantage over Asian alternatives.The NAFTAs Impact on the Maquiladora attentionTraditionally, Maquila doras offered foreign dutyes several advantages over other forms of direct foreign investment. Since the write of NAFTA, however, many of these advantages are either being phased-out or granted to all Mexican companies. The most significant advantages of operating as a Maquiladoras hold one hundred% foreign investment, operation without ownership of assets, tax sheltering of cost centers, and 100% duty-drawback or waivers for temporary imports. Furthermore, the NAFTA attempted to address the labor exploitation and environmental problems associated with the Maquiladora industry.One of the benefits of the Maquiladora program is 100% foreign investment of Mexican operations, which at once was not allowed. However, Mexicos Foreign Investment Law has changed with the old age (most significantly in 1989 and 1994)-full investment is now allowed in most business ventures.Operation Without Ownership of AssetsAnother advantage that Maquiladoras have is that they can procure production materials and capital goods as loans from their parent and client companies. As a result, most Maquiladoras have little of no inventory of fixed assets, eliminating the demand to pay the Mexican asset tax of 2% of all assets. In January 1995, the Mexican IRS reported that Maquiladoras would now have to factor the depreciation of loaned assets in price-transfer calculations, which is the first step toward phasing-out this advantage by 2001.When Maquiladoras are structured as cost center (providing manufacturing services for a foreign parent) the foreign tum has traditionally paid the Mexican company for operating costs addition negligible profit. By doing this they avoid Mexicos 34% corporate income tax, 10% mandatory profit sharing, and asset taxes. Now the Mexican IRS is changing the course Maquiladoras must declare assets. Over the next few years, Maquiladoras exit be forced to raise their declared profit percentage to a rate that is comparable to that of two unrelated compani es performing the same transaction at arms length. This is the type of transfer pricing procedure that is implemented by most trading blocks, like the EC. It will curtly be effect throughout North America.100% Duty-Drawback or Waivers for temp ImportsMaquiladoras have al way of lifes allowed Mexican companies 100% duty drawback or waivers in imported components that are exported as final goods. Since 1994, this has provided many Maquiladora programs a way to use non-NAFTA materials within products without the bring to pay the corresponding duties over those materials when trade or exporting goods to other NAFTA nations. On January 1, 2001, Maquiladoras that manufacture goods for export to NAFTA fellow countries will no longer be allowed to take the waiver. The waiver will still be available for goods that are going to non-NAFTA countries.In 1995 the NAFTAs of Labor created the National Administrative Office (NAO) as well as the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAA LC). Both were intend to stop labor abuses. The NOA was established to monitor labor complaints that NAFTA critics voice regarding unfair labor practices. The NAO can recommend ministerial consultations as well as imposed heavy sanctions against Mexico. Unfortunately, the side agreements proved useless. The NOA cannot force Maquiladoras to allow unions-the most they can do is recommend ministerial consultations. Sexual harassment and discrimination continues as well.The NAFTA has also created side agreements covering the environment. One of them is the North American Development Bank (NAD Bank). Its purpose was to finance effluent treatment projects along the border in the poorer communities. However, the most important criteria that inevitable to be met in order to receive funds were meeting certain market considerations. With this program NAFTA encouraged growth without regard for the environment through its practice of placing market consideration above environmental protection. Another is the outfit for Economic Cooperation (CEC). The CEC was established to investigate governmental non-enforcement of environmental laws. Unfortunately it has no power to enforce ,they can only investigate-and they cant even do that until Mexico collects the data on the pollution for them.Possible Strategy for the Maquiladora manufacturingAs long as the Mexican currency is weaker than the US dollar I dont think that the changes are going to dramatically effect the flow of US companies to the south. However, the Maquiladora industry cannot count on this for proceed growth. By the year 2001 the Maquiladora industry as we know it now will have significantly changed when the phasing out is complete. Maquiladoras will no longer be tax break establishments they will be just like other foreign investments.In order for them to fully compete in the sound future they must become more efficient and leaner. The impact of globalization is forcing manufacturers to produce more rapidly and cheaply than ever before and to unendingly improve. Because there will be no differentiation between the non-Maquiladora and Maquiladora industries I feel the inefficient producers will be wiped out. Therefor, Maquiladora employees will need fracture training, education, incentives as well improved working conditions and higher wages. Operations will also have to be streamlined in order to cast the benefits of economies of scale and scope.In addition, Mexicans as well as US citizens will take down to demand more accountability from the Mexican government and the Maquiladora industry. They need to be more responsible for their actions. What will the U.S. corporations do when human rights activists and environmentalists start lobbying and protesting on their US sites? Do they want to risk losing their shareholders to this type of veto attention?