History And The Human Sciences As Systems Of Knowledge :: essays research papers

What be the main difficulties valet de chambre scientists confront when trying to provide explanations of valet de chambrekind behaviour? What methods render been invented to circumvent these difficulties and to minimize their influence on the results that are obtained?Although many an(prenominal) people in the field of human acquaintances try to redeem their disciplines to be recognized as pure sciences, there are many differences that distinguish the native sciences from the human sciences. There is a certain praise that comes with the natural sciences that people in the human sciences crave, but human sciences foundation never be like the natural sciences. This is what causes there to be difficulties with human scientists trying to explain their science. They lack the definite, and factual ground on which the natural sciences are based. When a natural scientist hypothesises that when he heats some water to nose candy degrees, it will boil. And then after an experiment, it is shown that it does, one can not fence that perhaps on another day the water wouldnt palpate like boiling at 100 degrees, or that perhaps it was nevertheless boiling at that temperature because there were people watching. Water boiling at 100 degrees is a scientific fact. It will occur e truly season the experiment is carried out. However, in the field of human sciences, these facts do not exist, and this makes it very difficult for a human scientist to prove any of his theories, or expect on situations with any authority. The reason for this is that the study of human sciences involves, obviously, human behaviour. mankind behaviour does not follow the same patterns that are observed with particles of matter, or certain metals, it is almost totally unpredictable. However, the human sciences do use kindred methods of attaining knowledge to the natural sciences. The methods by which the human scientist attains knowledge has the same staple fiber principles to that of the natural scientist. They have hypotheses which they test through observing, and analysing their observations. However, in the natural sciences, the beholder is quite distinct from the experiment, as an astronomist is distinct from the planets and stars that he is observing. Whereas, in the human sciences, a human is the observer, and humans are the experiment. This complicates things. In every science there are theories. In the natural sciences these theories can be proved true or false, and therefore it can be determined whether these theories have an effect the result of the experiment.