Cloning: The Double-Edged Sword :: Biology

Cloning The Double-Edged SwordSuch a furore was created when the birth of Dolly the sheep the first successfully cloned mammal, was announced to the population in 1997, that the scientific community was gasping for air. Time and space seemed to have make do to a virtual standstill as scientists vigorously, non to mention obsessively, hypothesized the cosmic future electromotive force of Dr. Wilmuts teams revolutionary breakthrough in the dynamic terra firma of science. The euphoria of the moment, it seems, took some time to settle before scientists began to unravel the manageable detrimental ramifications of the discovery. Have Dr. Wilmut and team then generated a scientific miracle on one hand, while opening a Pandoras box on the opposite? It is difficult to dispute the fact that the successful cloning of Dolly has far-reaching applications in the twin fields of biotechnology and bioengineering. The advanced catching reprogramming techniques employed to mode the clone have opened the door to a multitude of potential avenues for application genetic engineering of organs for transplant purposes, xenotransplantation, cell therapy for illnesses such as Leukaemia, Parkinsons disease and diabetes, therapeutic cloning (the notion of ontogeny tissue for patients that is genetically identical to their own, for example neural cells could be make for people with Parkinsons disease, new muscle for those with ailing hearts and, later, perhaps even whole organs might be grown, all remedy from the threat of tissue rejection), and even in curtailing the extinction of endangered puppet species, just to name a a couple of(prenominal).While the advantages of nuclear transfer and genetic reprogramming seem manifold, the cloning and manufacture of transgenic life forms for research purposes, and not to mention the prospect of cloning humans, unearths countless compelling ethical questions which can, in my opinion, under no circumstances be satisfactorily answered. Here are a few to whet your appetite- Do we humans have the moral right to play God? What would go by to animals (or humans) cloned unsuccessfully with deformities, since the technology and its complementary knowledge are still embryologic and in their primacy? How would we ascribe an identity to a human clone? Since in that respect is no powerful and effective international regulation on the use of this technology in place today, how can we know for sure it is not being misused?