Tylenol Recall Essay Example for Free

Tylenol Recall EssayThe worldwide recall of the Tylenol harvest-time in light of discovering some samples having poison in them is most sure as shooting correct under the Utilitarian principle, which focuses on what provide be the greater good for the greater number. Obviously, when mankind lives ar at stake the greater good is almost always guaranteed to be whatever will pr train offt the loss of spiritedness.Granted, stockholders, stakeholders, patients, etc. were negatively effected for a short duration, and there were presumably several(prenominal) more stockholders and so on effected by the recall than there were potential deaths, but a company such as Johnson and Johnson has been able to maintain its positive image and consumer loyalty due to behaviors which are viewed as being morally responsible, so the short-term effects were likely minimal and exactly that short-term. An contend argument might be that the risks of any sympathetic life actually being lost was minimal, and that a random product sampling would have been enough to determine if indeed any other product had been contaminated, and therefore the product should NOT have been recalled, simply because the potential risk of loss of human life and the lawsuits sure to follow was less than the risk of dollars lost by the company, by the shareholders, by employees, suppliers, distributors, etc. whatever might argue this loss is far greater than any of the potential risks associated with the poisoned pills.However, once again to aver the Utilitarian principle, whatever is morally right is that which creates the most happiness, or overall good, for the larger number of people. Again, human death is something that is generally received as far more severe than the temporary loss of funds (which can be recovered). 15 human deaths in comparison to a loss of 15 million, even billion, dollars is far more significant in the minds of most people in our society.Especially for a consumer prod uct (and not for any greater purpose, such as the freedom of our country which leads to casualties of war), there is no level of acceptable loss of human life in the interest of saving a large potentiometer some money. The perseverance of human life produces greater happiness with the public, which also reinstalls faith in a morally responsible company such as Johnson and Johnson, which allows them to fairly easily recover any gain losses, which puts all the stockholders and others effected by it right back on a level playing field. And no lives were lost. By Utilitarian principles, everyone in this situation wins.